Welcome!

"Worthy of Discussion" was created to present important issues affecting
the American people.

You will find on the on the right side of this blog descriptive sub-categories
which will allow you to quickly go to topics you are interested in following.

We look forward to your participation, the more the varied opinions, the
better the discussion.

If you believe the commentaries and feedback are worthy as the title implies
please let others know about this blog and urge them to also contribution
to the conversation.

Warmest Regards,
Anthony Bruno
Save

Sunday, November 7, 2010

America...something to be proud of

Why are so many American political leaders so quick to reach for the
time-worn phrase..."to show the world"whenever our nations motives
are questioned.

Hasn't our nation done enough?

We have our military stationed around the world, providing international
stability and defense of our Allies. Yet, we are called 'imperialists'.

We are the first responder no matter the emergency, natural or aggression.

When earthquakes hit, we are there.
When Kuwait was attacked we were there.
When we were instrumental in creating the United Nations.
Or creating NATO to defend Europe from Soviet Union in advancing further than Eastern Block.
Or our ensuring the balance of power in the Middle East was maintained.

Republicans

Most Republicans and many conservatives are pleased with the projections for the upcoming mid-term elections as it appears the GOP will re-take the majority in both Houses. But concerns
remain as the unknown of what the new majority will do is subject to speculation.  xxx

We have heard GOP party leaders tell us some of what they hope to achieve; continue the Bush tax cuts,
restrict or repeal the health care bill; cut the excessive spending of the past two years, streamlining
of the legislative process and put some other curbs of  what Democrats and the president advanced.
But, is this enough? 

What we are hearing is good news, but the fundamentals of good governance need to be addressed
as well.

And, it starts with addressing the problem of a powerful central government which runs roughshod
over the states and the American people, no matter which party is in the majority. The "Imperial Congress"needs to be replaced.

For too long Congress has determined their self-governing rules, insulated itself from the laws all citizens
must abide by, ensured they have a competitive advantage when running for election including district boundaries and funding.

Unless a serious INDEPENDENT body, beyond the influence of the political class, is created to develop
and oversee the rules which govern Congress the public will continue to see abuses followed by light
penalties in the form of  meaningless and toothless "censures".

If the GOP has the courage to promote such a change the public will see true leadership in Congress
rather than the arrogance which has become all too familiar in recent years.

Anthony Bruno
Cary, NC

Southern Exposure

The history of the South is rich, but this matters little to those who are
quick to pick at the scab of slavery, eager to disparage an entire region
of our nation which only wants the deep cost they paid to be remembered
and  respected, no less than all Americans receive for their sacrifices.

Slavery may have been the issue that drove Southern states to form the
Confederacy, but the true cause was state rights.

Even today, neither the Congress or Federal agencies seems to know
the limits of their intrusion in matters best handled by the states.

Suppose the dozen or so states now filing law suits challenging the
constitutionality of the recently passed health care bill chose a different
course of action, establishing their own confederacy. What would be
said of these states?

At what point can the states say "No" to the dictates and demands of
a Federal government which produces nothing yet has  license to take
an unlimited amount of individual wealth, using the laws legislated by
the very people elected to represent the states?

The American people have no idea where the "border" exists that the
Federal government cannot legally cross, as it is constantly moved
deeper and deeper into areas not previously under the purview of a
national governing body.

The South will continued to be the "whipping boy" whenever critics of
our nation want to advance their own initiatives. It too bad many of
them are American citizens.

Taxes

The Purpose of Taxation........is to provide the necessary funds for government to function.

Questions which need to be answered.

1. What should government do?
2. How much money is needed?
3. What is the most efficient and least expensive way to bring in this money?

National government should be limited; only providing the services which states
cannot do.  Much of what the Federal government does rightly should be the 
responsibility of states with minimal involvement from Washington.

The states should decide which services it will provide, which will lead us to the amount
the Federal government will require to support whatever states do not provide.

There are two choices, continue to use the current system, or use one of several alternatives.

Problems with the current system:

a. Too complicated  (2000 tax forms, 175 instruction booklet, 66,000 page tax code)
b. Too costly to comply (Almost $400 billion per year)
c. Too expensive to administer. (Over 100,000 IRS employees)
d. Too intrusive on individuals and businesses  decisions (use of credits and exemptions to modify behavior) 

The current system is complicated and requires more than a third of the taxes collected to get
businesses and individuals to comply.


The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.


On July 12, 1909, the resolution proposing the Sixteenth Amendment was passed by the Sixty-first Congress and submitted to the state legislatures. Support for the income tax was strongest in the western states and opposition was strongest in the northeastern states.[20] New York Governor Charles Evans Hughes, who a few years later became a Supreme Court justice, opposed the income tax amendment. He believed "from whatever source derived" implied that the federal government would then have the power to tax state and municipal bonds, thus excessively centralize government power, and "would make it impossible for the state to keep any property".[21]



WYDEN: The big challenge is getting the leadership in both parties willing to take on the interest groups. I think we have a good chance, for example, with the deficit commission this summer. Senator Gregg is a member of it and I'm on the budget committee.
When they look at the options this summer given the fact that right now the spending far exceeds revenue, Senator Gregg and I can say there aren't many appealing alternatives out there. This is one you ought to like.
GREGG: Two things are going to give this a lift. Number one it makes sense. This is taking the tax laws, making them simpler, fairer, and much more pro growth so are we are more competitive in the world, so companies will expand here rather than go some place like Ireland where they get a tax break. This is a jobs' bill, that's the first thing.


Tax Year 2009 Tax Forms (Start Jan. 1 - End Dec. 31, 2010)




Tax collection statistics

Summary of Collections before Refunds by Type of Return, Fiscal Year 2007[15]
Type of Return Number of Returns Gross Collections
to the nearest million US$
Individual Income Tax 138,893,908 1,366,241,000,000
Employment Taxes 30,740,592 849,733,000,000
Corporate Income Tax 2,507,728 395,536,000,000
Excise Taxes 989,165 53,050,000,000
Estate Tax 55,924 24,558,000,000
Gift Tax 286,522 2,420,000,000
Total 173,351,839 2,691,538,000,000
During Fiscal Year (FY) 2006, the IRS collected more than $2.2 trillion in tax net of refunds, about 44 percent of which was attributable to the individual income tax. This is partially due to the nature of the individual income tax category, containing taxes collected from working class, small business, self employed, and capital gains. Of the Individual Income Tax, the top 5% of income earners pay 60% of this amount.[16][17]
Recently, the IRS has altered its policies. The current Service plus Enforcement equals Compliance motto mirrors its recent increase in investigations of abusive tax schemes.


As of 2007, the agency estimates it is owed $354 billion more than it collects.[18]


This proposal would achieve several worthwhile goals; simplify the tax code, stimulate the economy
by lowering business and government administrative costs and provide immediate tax relief to the people who needs it most, low and middle income workers and retirees.

Shifting the funding of Social Security and Medicare to the existing tax rate schedule will provide the 
fuel to energize our economy, keep more money in the pockets of all American workers, reduce the 
cost to businesses and eliminate the advantage of hiring undocumented workers.

The  $700 billion (2008) these two taxes provide would be generated with a slight increase in income
tax rates that would be at a minimum "revenue neutral", much less then the combined tax rate of 7.5%
(Note: The amount received could be much higher...see below.....undocumented workers)

Additionally, with the elimination of  the payroll tax, the Earned Income Credit,  created to offset this tax on low income wage earners, and cost  $40 billion (2004) could be reduced  or even eliminated. 


I also suggest the elimination of all income taxes on Social Security benefits which equaled approx. $20 billion (2007). As a "trade off" seniors will no longer receive the extra exemptions but would still be a net gain for them (cannot find the cost for this exemption)

These simple changes would be well-received by all citizens and businesses and show the American the "bait and switch" tax policies of credits and exemptions, based on behavior is one step closer to
being a thing of the past and on there way out.

The party and all of Congress should embrace these suggestions of this type, as the tax code should stop being a partisan issue, not used to drive the American people's behavior based on the desires of those elected to represent them.


Proposed list of tax code changes:

Eliminate Payroll (FICA), 6% and Medicare, 1.5%, taxes on individual income and businesses.

Increase tax rate code by 1% or amount which would bring in needed revenue to pay benefits.  
 





Health care

Judy,
Pass this along.....
While everyone in the GOP is telling our leadership what to say and do if/when the agree to meet with the
president I've yet to hear what needs to be promoted, a simple four element plan with the cost and benefit.
a. uninsured.....allow them to purchase under existing Federal plan, low income get govt assist.  My son is in Missouri, didn't have health insurance for new job, needed it for the kids, was able to get it for $127 mo. - employers should not be allowed 6 months before employees are covered
b. insurance co. will be allow to sell across state lines.  Absolutely!
c. pre-existing conditions will not cause refusal.  Yes, except in cases of drug addiction.  If they can buy drugs, they can pay for medical care
d. fired employees will continue to have health care for six months, paid by employer. I would word it "laid off" not fired because fired could be for good cause - such as theft, sleeping on the job, not showing up for work, etc.  If you say fired it could be manipulated.
e, Tort reform  Absolutely
f. Govt would place cap on Cobra after co. paid insurance runs out, if needed.  If company has to cover for 6 months, they can into plan through unemployment insurance.  Bag Cobra - it costs too much and we are now subsidizing it 65%.
g. Allow 100% deduction for all medical costs, as is allowed for property taxes and mortgage interest.  Outside of the standard deduction not as part of itemized deductions.


All this will be implmented once signed into law....
Wish they asked me to speak with the president....he wouldn't listen - he has his own agenda to make socialized medicine and that's that.  No matter what he says, I don't believe he wants to work with anybody.  His idea of working with people is to have them get on board for his ideas.  That's been obvious to me since the campaign.
- Show quoted text -